Is web development saturated (web dev)?

I am constantly hearing from folks in technology who are seeking their next job. The employment market is oversaturated, but I keep hearing from organizations and clients that they can't find qualified candidates. It's fantastic to see so many individuals in the Eddie hub community land their first, second, or tenth full-time or distant part-time work.

Can you figure out what the solution is? It's also not difficult, and you don't need to spend money or buy a course while you're thinking about it. The solution is to go open-source and stand up. Wait. I'm sure you've heard me say it a hundred times. I'm not suggesting you should volunteer every free minute or become a maintainer for some enormous, massive, incredibly fancy open-source project.

In reality, I've seen folks accomplish it in an hour or a week and obtain employment as a result. So, how did they do it? Yes, initially, this started with a focus on code, but today open source is so much more than coding is only a minor part of it. You can work on documentation, project management, and automation. There are several possibilities.

And, of all the activities you can do on getting Hub, which ones bring the most excellent value? You'll need to accomplish several things. And coding is just a tiny part of it. And by code, I mean that documentation is changing. The source files are only a tiny fraction of it. You can really look at your GitHub profile behind the tiles to see whether your contribution graph looks like a diamond, and ideally, it doesn't.

It displays the relative importance of changes, pulls requests, bugs, and code reviews. And those phrases might be rather frightening. But once you get started, if you get involved today, you'll understand it better, and you can't go wrong. Simply click that button and give it a shot. Most people, including me, find that graph to be unbalanced, but we attempt.

why is balancing so critical?

And why is balancing so critical? So, when I employ my clients, I look at your most recent code and wonder if it is better than it was three months ago. It makes no difference how fantastic it is today. We can keep improving as long as you're continually learning. That is why I recommend leaving your previous code in place at all times.

Don't get rid of outdated code. It is a necessary aspect of your trip. But, to be honest, I'm more interested in how you communicate and collaborate because, when working for a company or even a client on social media, you'll need to communicate and collaborate with people who are probably doing well. Concerning the challenges of commitment.

However, pull requests and code reviews are frequently absent. All of them are significant. It does not have to be precisely balanced, but you don't want one of them to say 0%. Let's begin with commits. This demonstrates how significant or tiny your commitments are, as well as whether or not they are late. The main point of a good commit message.

Do your issues provide context when you create them?

Remember that a pull request can have multiple commits and issues. Do your issues provide context when you create them? Can someone who has just discovered the product for the first time understand your problem? This is extremely important. Requests for pulls These are similar to issues, but they include your commits, which contain changes to the project.

This has a lot of issues. Is it possible for someone to comprehend your changes? Can they look over your changes? Do you have a screen capture? Do you tell a story? Obviously, I'm exaggerating. So, after reading it all for half a day, it's finding that balancing code review. This is most likely thought to be the most challenging.

You may, however, evaluate any pull request on GitHub. You don't need a well-known GitHub project. What you should do is provide value and perhaps ask a question. Regarding the pull request. Why did you go about it this way? Have you considered this? And you must do it constructively. People should not be made to feel horrible.

I understand what you're thinking. How can someone examine another person's work when it may not make sense? There might be someone new to the project who would benefit significantly from your fresh viewpoint. Does the paperwork. Does it make sense if you follow it?

Last Words

Remember that it's not just about the code. Twitter, please allow me to add something to the mix. Twitter, for example, is another excellent method to stand out. I always advise learning in public. So sharing what you learn on Twitter in bite-sized chunks that are easily consumable is a breeze. However, you should back it up using GitHub.

You can't just talk and do nothing. You really want to show people how wonderful you are, but having a presence on Twitter helps people to locate you and get more eyeballs on your GitHub page. And what you've been up to will boost your chances of attracting firms and clients.

Companies now have teams searching for people on Twitter. I've been working open source for almost ten years, and everyone has come to me for that time. And I desire this for you. I keep telling everyone that I receive my customers through GitHub job offers, but no one believes me, and I'm not sure why.